Advocacy in Action (March 2025): KABC Stands Against Medicaid Cuts

Libby Hastings • February 25, 2025

KABC is raising the alarm over proposed federal cuts to Medicaid that could strip away as much as $2.5 trillion from the program. This is not just a budgetary adjustment—it is a direct threat to the well-being of thousands of older Kansans who rely on Medicaid for their long-term care needs.


Dan Goodman, Executive Director of KABC, spoke out against these proposed cuts, emphasizing the urgent need for Kansans to take action: “I have no sense that this will deter the Federal Administration from taking action on this program, but rather the hope is to illuminate this issue for those Kansans that are paying attention and bring about a more calibrated approach. We must get Kansans to think about what long-term care looks like for Older Kansans with lesser Medicaid funding. I’m here to urge you to protect Older Kansans, protect Medicaid.”


Goodman was invited to speak at the Kansas Statehouse in Topeka on Monday, February 24, 2025, to address the recent movement by Congressional leaders to cut federal Medicaid funding. The informal gaggle took place in the east wing of the ground level of the Kansas Statehouse and gained statewide media attention. Other speakers included April Holman, Executive Director of the Alliance for a Healthy Kansas; Rocky Nichols, Executive Director of the Disability Rights Center of Kansas; and Adrienne Olejnik, Vice President of Kansas Action for Children.


Medicaid: A Lifeline for Older Kansans


Most Kansans over 65 rely on Medicare for their healthcare needs, but it is Medicaid that ensures access to long-term care services, whether at home or in nursing facilities. For thousands of seniors in Kansas, Medicaid is the only option that allows them to age with dignity in their own homes, receiving essential support services.


However, the impact of these proposed federal cuts would be catastrophic. Kansas already suffers from a critical shortage of direct care workers, and nearly 85,000 Older Kansans live in areas with limited access to care. Slashing Medicaid funding will only deepen this crisis. Rural communities, where healthcare access is already strained, will be hit the hardest. Short-term savings from these cuts will be overshadowed by the long-term damage—weakening the home and long-term care infrastructure, driving more providers out of the workforce, and placing tens of thousands of Older Kansans at risk.


Who Will Care for Older Kansans?


More than half of Kansas nursing home residents depend on Medicaid to afford care, which costs an average of $7,700 per month for a semi-private room. These older adults have already depleted their assets before qualifying for Medicaid, leaving them with no other options. Many have no family to step in, and even when family is available, they may not have the ability to provide the level of care required.


Without Medicaid, who will care for them? And how will Kansas taxpayers fill the financial void left by the loss of federal funding? This is not just a question of policy—it is a question of morality and responsibility.


Take Action Now


We cannot afford to wait and see what happens. Kansans must act now. Contact your federal representatives (Find Your Members in the U.S. Congress | Congress.gov | Library of Congress) and tell them: Medicaid is not just another federal program to be gutted—it is a lifeline for older Kansans. Do not allow reckless budget cuts to dismantle a system that so many depend on.



Stand up. Speak out. Demand that Medicaid funding is protected before it is too late. The future of long-term care in Kansas depends on it. Protect older Kansans. Protect Medicaid.


A hand places a red pill into a weekly medication box, surrounded by pill bottles.
By Libby Hastings March 25, 2026
On March 19, 2026, a Washington Post article highlighted a recent Office of Inspector General for the Department of Health and Human Services investigation that brought renewed national attention to a troubling reality inside America’s nursing homes: powerful antipsychotic drugs are being used not as treatment, but as control. The report found that some facilities are misdiagnosing residents with schizophrenia to justify prescribing antipsychotic medications. These drugs are often not approved for people with dementia and carry serious risks, including falls, strokes, and even death. In many cases, these medications are used to manage behaviors that are not dangerous, such as calling out, resisting care, or expressing distress. The result is what advocates have long warned about: the use of chemical restraints to sedate residents for staff convenience. A National Problem Decades in the Making The misuse of antipsychotic drugs in long-term care has been documented for years. In April 2024, KABC highlighted this issue in our advocacy work, noting that hundreds of thousands of nursing home residents nationwide are given antipsychotic medications, often without appropriate clinical justification. These drugs carry an FDA “black box” warning for use in older adults with dementia due to an increased risk of death. Federal efforts over the past decade have aimed to reduce unnecessary use, yet as of early 2026, approximately 17% of long-stay nursing home residents in the United States are still receiving antipsychotic medications. At the same time, recent federal policy discussions in March 2026 have raised concerns among advocates that loosening reporting requirements could reverse progress made in reducing inappropriate use. Kansas Is Not Immune This issue hits close to home. In 2022, the Kansas Legislature’s Senior Care Task Force released a report to the 2023 Legislature identifying the administration of antipsychotic medications and protections against abuse and neglect as critical areas for reform. The Task Force emphasized that these medications could have serious and even fatal consequences for older adults, particularly when used inappropriately. Advocates in Kansas have reported that up to 26% of nursing home residents, and nearly 40% of those with dementia, have been prescribed antipsychotic medications in recent years, despite well-documented risks. While some facilities have made progress, reductions in use have stalled in recent years, raising concerns that systemic issues remain unresolved. Why It Happens At its core, the misuse of antipsychotic drugs is often a symptom of deeper systemic problems, many of which have been exacerbated since the COVID-19 pandemic. Experts and investigators point to: Chronic understaffing, intensified since 2020 Lack of training in dementia care Pressure to manage behaviors quickly Lack of person-centered practices in care Gaps in oversight and accountability Non-drug approaches, like personalized care, meaningful activities, and addressing unmet needs, are widely recognized as best practice. But they require time, staffing, and resources that many facilities continue to lack in 2026. When those supports are missing, medication restraint becomes the default. What Proper Care Should Look Like Clinical guidance has long been clear, and yet remains unchanged in 2026. Antipsychotic medications should be a last resort, used only when: Non-drug interventions have failed The resident poses a risk to themselves or others The benefits outweigh the serious risks Even then, they should be used cautiously, closely monitored, and regularly reevaluated. The Path Forward for Kansas Kansas has an opportunity, and an obligation, to act. Building on the 2022 Senior Care Task Force recommendations, advocates continue in 2025–2026 to call for: Expanded access to geriatric mental health specialists Stronger oversight and enforcement Improved training in dementia and person-centered care Greater transparency for residents and families Meaningful solutions to the ongoing staffing crisis At its heart, this is about dignity. Older adults in Kansas adult care homes deserve care that respects their humanity, not treatment that silences it.
Kansas State Capitol building at dusk in Topeka
By Libby Hastings February 16, 2026
Kansas Advocates for Better Care testified on FE waiver funding and supported bills on decision-making, dementia training, and memory care standards.